Moscow Demands Staggering Amount in Compensation from Euroclear over Seized Funds
The Russian central bank has stated it is seeking damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear warning from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.
The Substantial Demand
According to accounts in local state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.
EU leaders will decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme involves granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic needs.
The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.
Dispute on Ownership
European Union officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.
Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal measures, including seizing EU private investors' assets within Russia.
Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.
Wider Implications
In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."
The clearing house declined to comment on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.
"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.
EU Countermeasures
European authorities said they are working on measures to deter other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."
The Proposed Loan Mechanism
Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.
Kyiv would only be required to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing conflict.
Alternative Proposals
The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.
This alternative move, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.
Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."